ABSTRACT
While most countries provide safe and effective influenza vaccines for at-risk groups, influenza vaccine coverage among children with rheumatic diseases remains uncertain. This study investigated influenza vaccination rates in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) during the 2019-2020 season and assessed the knowledge and attitudes of caregivers of children with JIA regarding influenza vaccination. The secondary aims were to identify barriers to vaccination and explore strategies to improve vaccination rates. A multi-centre, cross-sectional anonymous survey was conducted in 7 countries during the 2019-2020 influenza season to assess the uptake history of influenza vaccination. Among 287 participants, only 87 (30%) children with JIA received the influenza vaccine during the 2019-2020 season. Children who were more likely to be vaccinated were those with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), a history of previous vaccination and those aware of the vaccination recommendations. Conversely, children who previously experienced adverse vaccine-related events reported the lowest uptake. The primary reason for non-vaccination was lack of awareness about the necessity of influenza vaccination. Conclusion: Despite variations among countries, the uptake of influenza vaccines remains low in children with JIA. Improving awareness among families about the importance of influenza vaccination may increase vaccination rates in children with rheumatic diseases. What is Known: ⢠Rheumatic children are at increased risk for influenza infection due to immunosuppressive therapy and immune dysregulation. ⢠Influenza vaccine is formally recommended to children with rheumatic diseases. What is New: ⢠This multicentre study showed that influenza vaccine uptake rates remain suboptimal among children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis despite formal recommendations. ⢠Factors like previous experience with vaccination and information provided by medical professionals via different ways play essential roles in increasing vaccination rates and can contribute to improved health outcomes for these vulnerable children.
ABSTRACT
Septic arthritis (SA) is typically managed with antibiotic therapy with or without surgery. Little is known about how patients without surgery differ from their operatively managed counterparts. We compared SA patients who received antibiotic treatment with and without surgery. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with monoarticular septic arthritis admitted to a single tertiary care centre between 1998 and 2015. All 441 monoarticular septic arthritis patients received antibiotics; 382 were also managed operatively and 59 nonoperatively. Nonoperative patients were older (64.4 vs 58.3 years old; p = 0.02) and less likely to have prior joint pathology (44.1% vs 67.5%; p < 0.001). Nonoperative patients presented more often with sepsis (37.3% vs 31.9; p = 0.02) and were more frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (23.7% vs 16.5%; p = 0.04). Nonoperative patients were less often discharged to a rehabilitation facility (37.9% vs 55.8%; p = 0.002) and less frequently readmitted to hospital within 60 days of initial discharge (15.3% vs 18.6%; p = 0.05). However, nonoperative patients were more likely to expire within 30 days after hospital discharge (11.9% vs 3.9%; p = 0.009). Nonoperative patients were sicker at presentation; despite deferral of surgery, they had a relatively high survival rate (88%). Among survivors whose data was available, there were no significant sequelae in post-discharge imaging. These findings support the nonsurgical approach as effective for patients with septic arthritis who are not critically ill at time of presentation.
